Free download Balanced Scorecard Step-By-Step For Governmental And Nonprofit Agencies Pdf programs12/12/2016 An Error Occurred Setting Your User Cookie. A FRAMEWORK FOR GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS’ BALANCED SCORECARD. Governmental Organizations Balanced Scorecard, Performance. GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS VERSUS PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS. Balanced Scorecard: Step-by-Step for Government and Nonprofit Agencies. If you are interested in this model and are a governmental agency or a nonprofit organization. Download Alterar De Pdf Para Word free software; Download free Boite Vitesse Automatique Fonctionnement Pdf software; Download Candlemakers Petition Pdf free; Download Equations Of Mathematical Physics Pdf Tikhonov free. Improving Government Performance Use of Balanced Scorecard Nine step model. Improving Government Performance Use of Balanced Scorecard Nine. Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step for Government and non-profit agencies by. Step by step guid to file up joint dissolution of marriage PDF balanced scorecard step by step for governmental and nonprofit agencies PDF step by step torrent client instalation on wd my book live PDF. A balanced scorecard is a management tool that provides senior executives with a periodic assessment of how well their organization is progressing. Creating the balanced scorecard is a critical step in the strategic. Balanced scorecard step by step for governmental and nonprofit agencies PDF balanced scorecard step by step free book PDF balanced scorecard step by step pdf PDF modern compiler implementation in c pdf PDF. Balanced Scorecard Institute Customer / User Login. About the Balanced Scorecard; Articles & White Papers; Examples & Success Stories; Award for Excellence; The Nine Steps to Success. Journal of Practical Consulting - An Integrated Balanced Scorecard Strategic Planning Model for Nonprofit Organizations. Strategic planning presents a unique challenge to most organizations today, whether they are private, public, or nonprofit entities. Not only do strategic planning efforts frequently monopolize precious staff resources, but staff assigned to the strategic planning effort can be uncertain how to approach and execute this formidable task. Is planning a science or is it an art? Should an organization attempt to do strategic planning internally or should a seasoned consultant be brought in to guide the organization through the turbulence of an in- house planning initiative? These are difficult questions to answer and, while any strategic planning effort is a journey into the unknown, much of the uncertainty associated with planning can be addressed by following the guidance and structure offered by the Balanced Scorecard model. This article discusses what the Balanced Scorecard is, describes implementation guidelines, and proposes practical scenarios of how to implement the Balanced Scorecard for a new outreach ministry within a nonprofit religious organization. Also, due to the widespread popularity of Rick Warren's (1. Purpose- Driven Church model, a scenario is presented combining the Balanced Scorecard with the Purpose- Driven Church model to demonstrate the power and flexibility of the Balanced Scorecard as a strategic planning and performance measurement tool. Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Planning Model. In the early 1. 99. Robert Kaplan and David Norton of the Harvard Business School determined that 9. Niven, 2. 00. 3). According to Kaplan and Norton (1. While the success of private sector firms is measured by return on investment and profit margins, success in public and nonprofit organizations is primarily realized through constituent satisfaction and cost containment. Even though organizational structures, methods of operations, and values may differ among private, public, and nonprofit organizations, the challenge of performing and implementing strategic planning is common to all of them. Whether an organization is profit or people- driven, Kaplan and Norton's Balanced Scorecard provides a practical model for managers to define strategic themes and objectives, to implement strategy through all levels of the organization, and to measure performance. Simply stated, the Balanced Scorecard is a tool managers can employ to measure an organization's operational success through direct cause- and- effect linkages back into daily operations (Huselid, Becker, & Beatty, 2. Is it just another Management Fad? So, is the Balanced Scorecard a strategic planning model any organization can use to achieve breakthrough results or is its use confined only to certain organizations of excellence? Is it just another management fad du jour or does the Balanced Scorecard have long- term staying power as a strategic planning model? Labeled by the Harvard Business Review as . Balanced Scorecard evolved from a 1. This conceptual expansion is due in part to the evolution the Balanced Scorecard underwent as practitioners integrated it into new applications. While the generic appeal of the Balanced Scorecard has been the subject of numerous case studies, the real question is, . However, in an era of virtual organizations, instant communication, and quick fixes, according to Davenport, Prusak, and Wilson, the life span of a management idea in 2. Niven, 2. 00. 5). The fact that the Balanced Scorecard was introduced to the business world nearly 1. Balanced Scorecard is not a fad and is here to stay. Four Perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard. A Balanced Scorecard initiative begins with identifying strategies derived from the organization's vision and mission. Strategic themes are then developed by viewing the vision and mission statements from four distinct perspectives: Financial, Internal Processes, Customers, and Learning and Growth (Kaplan & Norton, 2. Figure 1 provides a graphical representation of how mission and values- focused strategy drives the four perspectives. Balanced scorecard strategic management model for the private sector. While private sector companies emphasize measuring success through financial measures, nonprofits also need to monitor budgets and expenses. The first perspective, the Financial perspective, defines financial strategic objectives and financial performance measures that provide evidence of whether or not the company's financial strategy is yielding increased profitability and decreased costs. This view also captures how the organization must look to customers in order to succeed and achieve the organization's mission. In the private sector, achieving financial strategic objectives is the primary means to realize the company's mission. However, financial performance is complemented and impacted by three other perspectives: Internal Processes, Customers, and Learning and Growth. The second perspective, Internal Processes, represents the impact of product and service quality and helps identify which internal business processes must operate with excellence in order to satisfy customers. Internal process metrics are then developed, which communicate the level of product quality through the monitoring of in- process metrics, as well as measuring productivity associated with the number of units produced or services provided (Brown, 1. Metrics defined for the Internal Process perspective are those that can be associated with satisfying customers and delivering value. As a result, delivering value to the customer with excellence yields a stronger financial performance for private sector organizations. However, for nonprofits, realizing excellence in internal operations correlates to increased constituent or congregant satisfaction, not financials (Niven, 2. The third perspective, Customers, represents another view of internal operations that has a cause- and- effect relationship with the Financial perspective and addresses how the organization must appear to customers in order to fulfill the organization's mission. For the profit- driven private sector, the Customer perspective supports the critical Financial perspective. However, for nonprofits, it is appropriate that the Customer perspective assumes primacy over the Financial perspective due to the critical need for constituent satisfaction. The fourth perspective, Learning and Growth, enables the other three perspectives and defines what type of staff and automation the organization must have in order to achieve the mission, support the internal processes, and satisfy the customers. In some organizations, this perspective may actually be labeled Enablers. Strategic objectives and metrics of the Learning and Growth perspective help to identify gaps between current employee skill levels, culture, and supporting information systems and discover the optimum level of operation at which these components become high performing internal processes (Niven, 2. Benefits and Cautions One benefit of viewing an organization through the four Balanced Scorecard perspectives is that this approach reduces information overload by condensing critical data needed for decision- making. The Balanced Scorecard also meets managerial needs by distilling varied unrelated measures from multiple areas within the company into a single report and ensuring that managers are looking at all measures across the operation. This approach also introduces the safeguard that one measure is not improved at the expense of another (Kaplan & Norton, 1. Developing organizational strategy through the Balanced Scorecard also minimizes participants' subjectivity as they take part in the strategy- setting process and enhances managers' ability to assess all programs for strategic impact without bias. Finally, strategic objectives represent concrete actions that support leaders in moving the organization toward achieving its mission and provide a methodology to align and leverage scarce work resources on tasks that will result in increased value to the customer. As comprehensive as the Balanced Scorecard system has proven to be, it also carries some cautions. The amount of time estimated to implement a Balanced Scorecard initiative should be carefully estimated and evaluated. This is particularly true if no Balanced Scorecard subject matter expert is available on the implementation team. Bullard (2. 00. 4) stated that effective strategy development and planning typically guide 3 to 5 years of an organization's future operations. Due to the length of this 3- to 5- year operating interval, it is beneficial that an organization allow an adequate amount of time to conduct a thorough Balanced Scorecard implementation. This 3- to 5- year operating interval contrasts sharply with the annual planning exercise conducted by many organizations that typically addresses the organization's operations only, for a 1- to 2- year period. Due to the amount of information synthesis required in a Balanced Scorecard initiative, an organization should realistically evaluate its ability to create and maintain an ongoing Balanced Scorecard effort. Six Action Steps of the Balanced Scorecard Implementation 1. Formulate the Purpose (Mission Statement)The mission statement should be brief, to the point, and state the reason why the organization exists. It should also include how the organization will operate in order to have maximum impact on its stakeholders. Using the practical example of starting an outreach ministry in a church setting (i. The mission statement should also reflect that ministry will be accomplished by equipping, affirming, and supporting lay leaders and participants who will be impacted by this ministry. A sample mission statement embracing these purposes might read: This outreach ministry responds to the churched and unchurched community's needs by: a.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |